The Apostle Paul admonishes the Christians at Corinthians, “But
everything should be done in a fitting and orderly way.” (I
Corinthians 14:40) Although the passage discusses the issue of
the Corinthian Christians disorderly conduct in matter
concerning Lord’s Supper and public worship, this can also apply
to the way how a church conducts her business. The purpose of
this article seeks to serve as a guide for church leaders as
they conduct the business of the church. Because of the
constrain of space we will only consider the basic principles of
conducting church business in the church. The Christian leader
is encouraged to pursue additional studies in one or more of the
references listed at the end of this article. In order to
achieve this goal, the church leader needs a basic understanding
of the parliamentary procedures.
The New Testament church should maintain a respect for and an
appreciation of parliamentary procedures. Let us begin by
defining parliamentary procedures
Parliamentary law is a set of common-sense rules to democratic
bodies in the transaction of business. . . It is a simple,
businesslike plan for conducting a business meeting in a
Christian manner and an orderly fashion. It provides full and
open discussion in such a way that the will of the majority may
be determined without confusion. Every member is given equal
opportunity in every respect.
Advantages of knowing parliamentary procedure is vital for the
church to achieve the greatest progress toward achieving the
adopted goals. Thomas L. Lynn in his book, Church Administration
presents five advantages of knowing parliamentary procedures.
1 The business is conducted in an orderly manner
2 The meeting takes less time
3 The people involved have a clearer understanding of what is
going on
4 Each person has an opportunity to express his opinions
5 Records are easier to keep
It is important to know the procedures of parliamentary law, but
even more important to practice the procedures when conducting
church business. People often make unkind remarks about
proceedings they have witnessed in church business meetings.
Gaines Dobbins has wisely stated, When controversy arises, the
faithful become alarmed and the careless become interested.
Before we begin to conduct business meeting, we need to be sure
what the church hopes to accomplish in the business session. We
need to know what the
desired outcome will be. If we cannot reasonably predict the out
come of a matter
of business, it is not yet ready for presentation to the church.
Being able to reasonably predict the outcome of each motion
shows that we have done our homework and that we are, in fact,
the leaders of the church.
There are some basic principles that will help us to ensure that
a meeting will be successfully conducted. Three steps are
suggested by Browning Ware
1 Define Priorities: Leaders, particularly the moderator, must
be sensitive to the relative significance of matters for
discussion and vote.
2 Dignify the meeting: This is not a call to stuffiness.
Informal meetings may have dignity. Dignity is largely a matter
of attitude in those who address the congregation. Avoid ‘forced
reports’ from unwilling substitutes.’ I didn’t know I was to
speak.’ ‘I guess I could say a few words’, etc.
3 Defend Congregational Democracy: Church business has the
reputation of being uninteresting, particularly when someone is
ramrod ding it. Leaders can vitalize business sessions by
providing a welcome climate for all onions. Fear of being
embarrassed has been interpreted as agreement and dull quietness
as peaceful unanimity.4
One of the constant complain about business is the poor
attendance. Thus we need to make careful plans to encourage
increasing attendance and participation at its business
meetings. Garland Hendricks lists nine factors which the church
can implement for this purpose.
1 An agenda for each meeting, carefully planned and announced in
advance so that the church members know what to expect.
2 A policy whereby only important church matters are brought up
in business meetings.
3 A strategy clearly designed for moderating meetings so that
everyone can expect fairness and firmness.
4 Special attention to keeping all business meetings on time and
within reasonable time limits.
5 A requirement by the moderator (the pastor) that any person
address the Chair, be recognized, then speak only to the subject
under consideration.
6 Previous arrangements for all reports to be factual, brief,
and clearly presented.
7 A series of four discussions at payer meeting emphasizing the
importance of business meetings.
8 A decision by the church concerning the most appropriate time
for the congregation to conduct business meetings
9 Several church leaders making a covenant that they would
attend
business meetings faithfully.
There is often a debate on the subject of who should be the
moderator. After the church and the pastor have an opportunity
to consider varying aspects of this officer’s role and the
potential leadership available for the role, the selection
should be made with everyone in agreement.
Maddry has contrasted the pastor as moderator and the layman as
moderator. He presents each possibility with respective
strengths.
When the Pastor is Moderator- (Well over 75% of churches
world-wide maintain the pastor as the moderator or chairman.)
1 The pastor by training, experiences and personal interest is
more able to keep the meeting more ‘brotherly’.
2 The pastor usually knows better than any other person the
matters to come before the church.
3 If an average layman is to moderate the sessions, the pastor
still must often explain the matters which should come before
the
When a layman is Moderator
1. The pastor has more freedom to speak from the floor and to
present or explain any matter which comes before the church.
2. This arrangement keeps the pastor aloof from the business so
that he can better be the spiritual leader of the church.
3. The laymen feel a greater sense of responsibility when they
conduct their own business sessions.6
For the last 30 over years I have been in the ministry I have
served as chairman of the Council, Business meeting, Diaconate.
I find it very refreshing and relaxing when I come to Miami
because for the first time in my pastoral ministry I do not have
to serve as chairman. This is the way I like it. This will allow
me more time to attend to the spiritual aspect of the ministry.
Practical Tips for the Moderator
The late Dr. McCoy states,
Parliamentary procedure is viewed by some as being ‘common sense
used in a gracious manner’. A contrasting view is that
‘parliamentary procedure is the devil’s democracy’. Which it is
depends upon the understanding and use (or abuse) of procedure
both by the moderator and the members.
1. Consider persons more important than procedures. Maintain the
spirit of Christian love while you preside.
2. Seek to be more Christ like than business like. Try to
breathe Christian
warmth into the deliberation of the body.
3
3. Be honest, fair and courteous with all members. Protect the
rights of each one.
4. Give help to members who are not familiar with parliamentary
procedure and do so in a way that will not embarrass them.
5. Do not permit a matter to be discussed until a motion has
been made, seconded, and you have stated it to the body.
6. A member should not be permitted to merely, ‘I so move’ when
referring to an idea or suggestion made by someone else. Insist
that a motion be stated.
7. You cannot make a motion. You can suggest that some member
make one by stating, ’A motion is in order to…’
8. Call on the person who makes a motion to discuss it first. He
is the most logical reason for doing so.
9. Follow the principle of full and free debate. Good creative
discussion is the essence of democracy. Lead members to talk
through their disagreements.
10. A member who has not spoken should be given preferences over
one who has. Be careful not to let one or a few monopolize the
discussion.
11. Alternate discussions so as to bring out both sides of a
question. This will help members in arriving at their decisions.
12. Respect the minority. While the majority must prevail, the
minority has a right to be heard.
13. Maintain a neutral position while presiding. Ask an
assistant to preside if you wish to debate a question under
consideration.
14. If the procedure bogs down, speed it up where you can, but
do not take short cuts. By no means should you force a
proposition through by voting.
15. Always take the affirmative vote first. Then take the
negative vote second, but always take it. This protects the
rights of the minority.
16. It is correct to assume that members who do not vote are on
the prevailing side.7
Moderator’s Control Points
The manner in which a meeting is conducted, the atmosphere of
the meeting, the direction the meeting takes and the action
taken at the meeting is largely dependent upon the moderator.
The group holds this person responsible to possess and exercise
the skills required of this office.
Auger maintains there are seven techniques in conducting a
meeting that every leader can learn which will enable a
moderator to achieve the desire objectives in conducting a
business meeting:
Control Points for the Chairman
1. Stimulate discussion; don’t let the meeting drag.
4
2. Balance the discussion; don’t let any single point of view
predominate when others are to be heard.
3. Keep the discussion on track; don’t let people digress.
4. Break up hot controversies; they’ll tear the meeting apart.
5. Keep the meeting lively; don’t let people daydream.
6. Watch your timetable; finish on schedule.
7. Make sure there is a conclusion and some positive action
initiated.8
Some patterns which insure the lack of or even the loss of
control in a business meeting:
• Come to the meeting without adequate preparation—no agenda.
• Maintain the authoritarian style of leadership.
• Permit interruptions from the outside sources to control your
attention; i.e. telephone calls from which are not emergencies.
• Resent questions raised from the floor about something you
say.
• Allow the meeting to ‘run by itself’ with little or no
direction.
• Criticize and/or demonstrate resentment to one person or to a
small group.
• Attempt the comedian role.
Remember: The model you set will be copied by one or more who
are learning from you style of being the moderator/
chairman—make your model one which is worthy of copying!
Practical Tips for members
Dr. McCoy presents sixteen “Practical Tips for Member’ which
might be helpful if a copy could be provided for each church
member.
1. Always express your ideas and views on a proposition. This
will aid others in making intelligent and fair decisions.
2. If you do not know the proper procedure or how something
should be said, ask the moderator. It is his responsibility to
help you.
3. Work for the good of the body. Do not let personal preference
color your discussion of determine you vote.
4. Obtain the floor before stating your motion or discussing a
motion. You do this by standing and calling, ‘Mr. Moderator.’
5. Introduce a motion with the words, ‘I move that…’ Any other
way of stating a motion is incorrect.
6. Be gracious, charitable, and confident in you manner and
choice of words.
7. Say or do nothing that will cause embarrassment to the
moderator or to a fellow member.
8. Avoid being ‘smart’ or ‘cute.’ This is not good taste in any
kind of church meeting.
5
9. Refrain from deliberately trying to get the moderator into a
parliamentary tangle. To do so is both disrespectful and
unchristian.
10. Stay on the subject before the body. Do not introduce
irrelevant or unimportant matters.
11. Be careful not to monopolize a discussion however much you
may be interested in it.
12. Refrain from moving the previous question to deliberately
cut off debate. This is out of place in a Christian democracy.
13. Show courtesy and respect for the moderator by refraining
from carrying on a conversation with another person while he is
presiding.
14. Make sure you understand what action is being proposed
before you vote.
15. Pray and seek God’s leading in determining how you should
vote. How you arrive at your decision may be more important than
voting your decision.
16. Vote when you can do so intelligently. Not to vote has been
said to be ‘one-half vote for and one-half vote against.9
Reaching Consensus in a Business Meeting
It is quite simple to say that to reach consensus in any type of
group meeting there will need to be some ‘give and take’ on the
parts of all concerned. There is a way to enable the body to
take steps which will assist the members in reaching consensus
and thus to build a high trust and low fear atmosphere in the
body. John Kline has proposed ten techniques for the group to
implement in reaching consensus in a meeting:
1. Orient the Group
2. Insist on True Consensus
3. Keep Maintaining Your Position as Long as It is Valid
4. Seek Out Differences in Opinion
5. Remain Open to Other Opinions
6. Be Willing to Compromise
7. Contribute Frequently to the Discussion
8. Use Group Pronouns Rather Than Personal Pronouns
9. Give Adequate Information
10. Clarify the Discussion.10
The following page gives us an overview of a practical guide to
parliamentary procedures.11
Endnotes
1. T. B. Lackey, “It Pays to Know Parliamentary Procedures”
Church Administration, July 1960, p.16
2. Thomas L. Lynn, “How’s your Parliamentary Procedures?” Church
Administration, April 1964, p. 47
3. Gaines S. Dobbins, The Churchbook, (Broadman Press, 1951),
pp.194 & 195.
4. Browning Ware, “Getting the Church Business Meeting Off the
Ground” Church Administration, October 1966, p. 9.
5. Garland A. Hendricks, “What’s A Business Meeting For?” Church
Administration, October 1965, p; 34.
6. Charles A. Maddry, “Who Should Serve as Moderator of a
Church?” Church Administration, February 1961, pp. 29-30.
7. Lee H. McCoy, “Understanding and Using Parliamentary
Procedures.” Church Administration, February 1979, pp.31-32
8. B. Y. Auger, “Make Those Meetings Pay Off” Supervising
Management, October 1963.
9. McCoy, Ibid,. . 32
10. John A. Kline, “How to Reach Consensus in Your Meetings.”
Church Administration, June 1980, pp31-32
11. Lee H. McCoy, “A Practical Guide to Parliamentary
Procedures” Church Administration, October 1979, pp. 26-27. |